NY State Court Holds that Student Violated Status by Working at a Different Campus

March 10th, 2010 by Jennifer Hermansky

On February 5, 2010, the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, of New York held that an F-1 student violated his status by tutoring at another campus location of the university that he attended. The student was pursuing a Master’s degree at the State University of NY at Binghamton. While attending school at the Binghamton campus of SUNY, he also tutored students attending the State University of NY at Morrisville, some 70 miles away. The student argued that he was engaging in “on campus” employment, which is allowed under the regulations found at 8 CFR §214.2(f)(9)(i). That regulation requires the employment must be performed on the school’s campus or at an off-campus location that is “educationally affiliated with the school.”

 
The court found in favor of the school. The court rejected the student’s argument that tutoring at the Morrisville campus was “on campus” employment because both campuses were part of the SUNY network. Specifically, the court stated that “the tutor position could not have been on-campus employment as SUNY Morrisville – the place where petitioner was employed – is located almost 70 miles from the SUNY Binghamton campus.” The court also found that the student’s tutor position “does not appear to have any educational affiliation with SUNY Binghamton’s curriculum in a manner contemplated by these regulations.” The court recognized that both schools were in the SUNY network, but that they are “separate and distinct educational institutions with differentiated and designated missions.”

 
Klasko reminds students that they always check with their designated school official (DSO) prior to accepting off-campus employment in order to maintain valid F-1 status.

 
A copy of the decision can be read at: decisions.courts.state.ny.us/ad3/Decisions/2010/507473.pdf

Share/Save/Bookmark

PA Employer Sentenced for Hiring Illegal Aliens

March 10th, 2010 by Jennifer Hermansky

Employers in Pennsylvania should heed the warnings of this story – it can be quite costly to hire illegal workers. Robert Kramer of Philadelphia was sentenced to one year of probation, including six months of home confinement, after he plead guilty to charges of knowingly employing illegal immigrants at a chain of car washes. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) investigated Kramer, which turned up over 50 illegal immigrants at Car Care, Inc. The business operated more than 50 car washes in six states, including Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

According to ICE, Kramer hired undocumented workers, gave those workers the names of former employees, and then paid the undocumented workers with checks in the names of the former employees. U.S. District Court Judge Darnell C. Jones, II, ordered Kramer to pay a $75,000 fine to be paid with personal, not corporate, funds. Judge Jones also ordered Kramer to perform, at the Court’s direction, community service.

Increased investigations and I-9 audits, coupled with ICE’s prerogative to collect civil penalties from employers and individuals, necessitate the maintenance of organized I-9 files.

For more information on worksite compliance, ICE enforcement actions, and how these developments impact your business please visit our website www.worksite-compliance.com or consult with a Klasko Law attorney.

Share/Save/Bookmark

ICE Issues More Notices of Inspection

March 9th, 2010 by Jennifer Hermansky

Last week, Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued a press release stating that it will send another 180 Notices of Inspection (NOIs) to businesses in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas and Tennessee. The notices alert the employers that ICE will be coming to their workplace to inspect I-9 records. This marks another round of inspections by ICE, which in 2009 issued 1000 NOIs to employers around the country. Acting special agent in charge of the ICE Office of Investigations in New Orleans, Raymond R. Parmer, Jr., stated that “ICE is committed to establishing a meaningful I-9 inspection program to promote compliance with the law. This effort is a first step in ICE’s long-term strategy to address and deter illegal employment.”

Employers around the country should expect ICE to issue more NOIs throughout 2010. As ICE explained, in 2009 it “implemented a new, comprehensive strategy to reduce the demand for illegal employment and protect employment opportunities for the nation’s lawful workforce. Under this strategy, ICE is focusing its resources on the auditing and investigation of employers suspected of cultivating illegal workplaces by knowingly employing illegal workers.”

Klasko reminds employers that it is critical to keep accurate I-9 records. Form I-9 requires employers to determine the employment authorization of hires by reviewing and recording the employee’s identity documents and determining whether the documents reasonably appear to be genuine and related to the individual. Employers are required to maintain an original Form I-9 and supporting documentation for all current employees. Employers also must retain an I-9 file for at least 3 years from the employee’s hire date, or 1 year after the employee’s termination date, whichever is longer.

For more information on worksite enforcement issues, please visit our website at: http://www.worksite-compliance.com.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Department of State Proposes Fee Increases for Consular Services

February 18th, 2010 by Jennifer Hermansky

On February 9, 2010, the Department of State (DOS) issued a proposed rule to increase fees for certain consular services. DOS announced that it is adjusting the fees in light of an independent cost of service study, which found that the government is not fully covering its costs for providing consular services under the current fee structure.

 
There are two important fee changes listed in the proposed rule. First, the proposed rule establishes a tiered application processing fee for immigrant visas depending on the visa category, as determined by the cost of processing that particular category of visa. Second, the proposed rule increases the adult passport book application fee from $55 to $70.

 
1. Immigrant Visa Processing Fees

 
DOS is changing the fee for processing an immigrant visa from $355 for all immigrant visas, to a four-tiered fee based on estimates for each category of immigrant visa, as applications for certain categories of immigrant visas cost more to process than others. As a reminder, immigrant visa fees are collected by the DOS when applicants apply for an immigrant visa at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate abroad, rather than applying for a green card in the U.S.

 
The new tiered system will have the following cost changes:

 
· Family-based (immediate relative and preference) visas, which are processed on the basis of an I-130, I-600 or I-800 petition, will be $330.

· Employment-based visas, which are processed on the basis of an I-140 petition, will increase significantly to $720.

· Other immigrant visa applications, including for I-360 self- petitioners, special immigrant visa applicants and all others, will have a fee of $305.

· Winners of the Diversity Visa lottery who apply for immigrant visas will increase from $375 to $440 based on estimates for an FY 2010 workload projection of 81,000 applications.

· DOS also is increasing the immigrant visa security surcharge, which almost all applicants must pay, from $45 to $74 to cover increased security costs.

 
2. Fees for U.S. Passports

 
DOS is increasing the application fee for a passport book for an adult (age 17 and older) from $55 to $70. The application fee for a passport book for a minor (age 16 and younger) will remain at $40. DOS also is increasing the security surcharge from $20 to $40 as well, in order to cover the costs of increased border security which includes, but is not limited to, enhanced biometric features in the passport book itself.

 
Additional fee increases for passport services:

 
· Extra pages - In the past, DOS provided extra pages in a customer’s passport, to which foreign countries’ visas may then be affixed, at no charge. DOS now will charge $82 for this service.

· Passport Card - DOS has decided to raise the adult passport card application fee from $20 to just $30, and the minor passport card application fee from $10 to just $15.

· Documentation for Renunciation of Citizenship – The cost study found that documenting a U.S. citizen’s renunciation of citizenship is extremely costly, requiring American consular officers overseas to spend substantial amounts of time to accept, process, and adjudicate cases. A new fee of $450 will be established to help defray a small portion of the total cost to the government of documenting the renunciation of citizenship.
When will the fees increase?

 
DOS intends to implement this proposed rule, and initiate collection of the new fees, as soon as practicable following the expiration of the 30-day public comment period following publication in the Federal Register on February 9, 2010, and after the DOS has had the opportunity to fully consider any public comments received. Klasko will alert our clients who may potentially be impacted by the increased fees.

Share/Save/Bookmark

USCIS Clarifies H-1B Issues for TARP Fund Employers

February 17th, 2010 by Jennifer Hermansky

On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the stimulus bill into law, which contained the Employ American Workers Act (EAWA). This law stops U.S. employers from displacing U.S. workers when hiring H-1B workers if the employer received funding through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).

If an H-1B employer received TARP funding, the employer must make attestations on its Labor Condition Application (LCA) filed with the Department of Labor (DOL), including attesting to good faith recruitment efforts and having hired any qualified US workers, prior to filing an H-1B petition. Any company that received TARP funding and seeks to hire H-1B workers is considered to be an “H-1B dependent employer” under EAWA.

H-1B dependent employers, including all TARP recipients with outstanding obligations, make these additional attestations on an LCA:

• The employer has taken or will take good faith steps meeting industry-wide standards to recruit U.S. workers.
• The employer will offer compensation that is at least as great as those offered to the H-1B worker.
• The employer has offered or will offer the job to any U.S. worker who applied and is equally or better qualified for the job.
• The employer will not displace any similarly employed U.S. worker within the period beginning 90 days before and ending 90 days after the date of filing the I-129 petition.
• The employer will not place an H-1B worker at another employer unless it has inquired whether the other employer has displaced or will displace a U.S. worker within 90 days before or after the placement of the H-1B worker. This is called the “secondary displacement inquiry.”

What if your company received TARP Funding?

H-1B employers first must identify if they have received TARP funding, as USCIS contacts the Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and other relevant agencies to identify employers who have received TARP funding. Employers must accurately complete Form I-129W, H-1B Data Collection and Filing Fee Exemption Supplement, which asks the employer if it is H-1B dependent. You should alert your Klasko Law attorney if your company received TARP funding, as additional recruitment steps may be necessary before you file an H-1B petition for a new H-1B employee. This is particularly important in light of the approaching April 1, 2010 deadline for filing new H-1B petitions with an October 1, 2010 start date.

If your company has received TARP funding, EAWA applies to any H-1B petition filed on or after February 17, 2009 for employment by a “new employer.” Any TARP recipient seeking to hire a new H-1B employee with no prior employment relationship is subject to EAWA. This includes “concurrent employment,” where an employer hires a new employee who continues work with another employer in H-1B status. EAWA also applies even if you filed the H-1B petition prior to February 17, 2009, but the new H-1B employee commences employment after February 17, 2009.

EAWA does not apply to H-1B extension petitions for a current employee with the same employer. It also does not apply to an H-1B petition to change the status of a current U.S. work-authorized employee to H-1B status with the same employer. For example, if the employer has an employee in L-1 status, and the employer wishes to change the employee’s status to H-1B, EAWA would not apply.

EAWA remains in effect until February 17, 2011.

What if We Repaid Our Funding?

USCIS recently confirmed that if you received TARP funding, but have repaid your obligations, an employer will no longer be considered H-1B Dependent. Employers who have repaid their obligations should answer “no” to Question A.1.d. on the H-1B Data Collection and Filing Fee Exemption Supplement. USCIS also encourages employers to submit evidence that their TARP obligations have been repaid to avoid processing delays.

Share/Save/Bookmark

H-1B Nonimmigrant Workers Denied Entry at Newark Airport

February 1st, 2010 by Kate Kalmykov

Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP has learned that Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) officials have been issuing expedited removal orders to certain H-1B nonimmigrant workers seeking entry at Newark airport in New Jersey.  H-1Bs that have been targeted include those working at IT consulting firms and those posted at third-party worksites. 

 
Expedited removal in which the government covers the costs of the return airline ticket, bars the individual from reentering the U.S. for a period of five years.  CBP officers are authorized to institute expedited removal when they believe that an individual is entering the U.S. in violation of the terms and conditions of the visa.  Reports from those impacted state that they were put into secondary inspection by CBP officers and coerced into signing statements that contain falsehoods.  These statements were then used as the basis for their removal.  Interestingly, the H-1Bs were not advised that they could withdraw their applications to enter the U.S. and return home at their own expense.  This option would have allowed the nonimmigrants to apply for a new H-1B visa stamp either with the same or a new H1B employer and reenter the U.S. at anytime thereafter.

 
Entering nonimmigrants are often placed into secondary inspection if CBP officers wish to question the alien as to the intent of their stay in the U.S.  Although intimidating, it is critical for nonimmigrants to ensure that they answer all questions honestly and accurately, as only erroneous expedited removal orders can be vacated. Unfortunately, aliens seeking entry at CBP do not have a right to counsel and therefore, must be extremely precise when articulating their reasons for entry to CBP.  It is believed that CBP in Newark is instituting these actions in response to the recent USCIS memo which limits the definition of the employer-employee relationship and in particular targets IT consulting companies and “job shops.” 

Klasko Law will continue to provide updates on this issue.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Immigration Community Offers Assistance to Haitian Nationals Eligible for TPS

January 22nd, 2010 by Kate Kalmykov

 As a result of the catastrophic events in Haiti, immigration attorneys from around the country, including those at Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP, have come together to offer assistance to Haitian nationals in obtaining temporary protected status (TPS) and employment authorization.

Applicants from the Haitian community in New York can attend a free clinic where lawyers will provide assistance in preparing applications for TPS on Thursday, January 28, 2010 from 5:30 to 8 p.m. at the New York City Bar Association located at 42 W. 44th Street.  Haitians in the Philadelphia area can contact HIAS and Council of Migration Service of Philadelphia at (215) 832-0900 to request a referral to a volunteer immigration attorney.

 We encourage Haitian nationals that were in the country prior to the date of the earthquake January 12, 2010 and are eligible for TPS to act quickly, as the TPS registration period will only run for 180 days from January 21, 2010 until July 21, 2010.

Share/Save/Bookmark

USCIS Issues Guidance Establishing the “Employee-Employer Relationship” in H-1B Petitions

January 18th, 2010 by Kate Kalmykov

On January 13, 2010, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued guidance that imposes enhanced evidentiary requirements on employers filing H-1B petitions.  The memo discusses what evidence must accompany an H-1B petition to establish a valid employer-employee relationship.  The guidance also addresses in what instances the H-1B visa is appropriate for foreign workers who will be placed at third-party client worksites. It also discusses if self-employed individuals, business owners, and independent contractors can continue to qualify for the H-1B.

The federal regulations governing the H-1B classification require that an employer establish that it has an employer-employee relationship with the beneficiary of a petition.  The new memo provides guidance on how USCIS will evaluate if this relationship exists.  The memo lists a variety of factors to be considered when evaluating the petitioner’s right to control the beneficiary, including the manner and extent to which the petitioner actually supervises the beneficiary; the petitioner’s right to control the beneficiary’s daily work and work product; and the petitioner’s right to hire, pay and fire the beneficiary.  USCIS instructs its adjudicators to review the totality of the circumstances when making a final determination of whether the employer-employee relationship exists.  The memo also requires that the petitioner establish that the right to control the beneficiary’s work will continue to exist throughout the duration of the beneficiary’s employment with the petitioner.

Read more after the jump.

View rest of post »

Share/Save/Bookmark

USCIS Grants Temporary Protected Status for Haitians

January 18th, 2010 by Kate Kalmykov

The USCIS has announced that Department of Homeland (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano has designated Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for eligible nationals of Haiti.  The Secretary stated that this decision is warranted because of the devastating earthquake and aftershocks which occurred on January 12, 2010.  DHS estimates that approximately 100,000 to 200,000 individuals will be eligible for TPS. 

TPS is a temporary immigration status granted to eligible nationals of a certain country designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security because the country has experienced temporary negative conditions, such as armed conflict or an environmental disaster, that prevent nationals of the country from returning safely or for the country to handle their return adequately. 

The Haitian TPS registration period will run for 180 days.  DHS stated that TPS eligibility will be for an initial period of 18 months.  Applicants who apply for TPS will also be able to apply for an Employment Authorization Document and Advance Parole Travel Document.  Although, these applications will require fees, DHS has stated that they will consider fee waivers for those that can demonstrate that they are unable to pay the costs of the applications.

As proof of nationality, USCIS is looking primarily for a passport (an expired one is acceptable) or birth certificates. For those that have problems with obtaining this documentation, USCIS indicated that secondary evidence would be considered.

On the subject of orphans, USCIS noted that, if adopting parents were in the Haiti at the time of the earthquake, they may go to the U.S. embassy to complete the adoption process, and the government of Haiti will waive the exit visa requirement. DHS and the Department of State are still working on the issues related to adoptions by parents not in Haiti. They urge parents not to travel to Haiti at this time.

Share/Save/Bookmark

New Prevailing Wage Process Implemented by the Department of Labor

January 11th, 2010 by Kate Kalmykov

 

The Department of Labor (DOL) has nationalized the process for issuance of prevailing wage determinations used in a variety of immigration applications including PERM, H-1B, H-1B1 (Chile/Singapore), E-3 (Australia), and H-2B.  Beginning January 1, 2010, employers must now apply for prevailing wage determinations to the DOL rather than the state workforce agencies (SWAs).  DOL has indicated that from January 1, 2010 through January 20, 2010 prevailing wage requests must be submitted by mail.  After January 20, 2010 DOL expects that submissions will be able to be made through the iCERT portal.   
 
DOL issued prevailing wage determinations are a mandatory requirement for PERM applications.  The agency has advised employers to submit prevailing wage requests at least 60 days before beginning recruitment or filing an application for labor certification.  Likewise, DOL has indicated that prevailing wage requests using independent wage sources could have lengthier processing times.  As we have reported, the introduction of the 
iCERT system for preparation of LCAs has significantly lengthened preparation time due to technical glitches in the system. It is therefore critical for employers to be aware of these delays, especially if they are filing PERM applications for H-1B nonimmigrant workers who are reaching the end of their fifth year of status and who wish to extend that status beyond the six-year maximum under the provisions of AC21. 

 

In addition to processing delays, it remains to be seen if the validity periods for prevailing wage determinations issued by the DOL will be shorter than those that were issued by local SWAs.


Although prevailing wage determinations from the DOL are not required for H-1B cases, they are preferred by some employers as they provide important safe harbors.  Given the expected delays in DOL processing times for issuance of prevailing wage determinations it is critical that employers identify and begin preparing cap-subject cases for the Fiscal Year 2011 as soon as possible.

 

While DOL policy guidance states that there will be no changes in the way prevailing wages are determined, employers should note that the national office may take a different approach from local SWAs in determining how occupational categories and wage levels are assigned.   DOL has indicated that the national office will entertain requests for redetermination.  Redeterminations will be handled by the Office of Foreign Labor Certification.  Requests to reconsider redeterminations can be submitted to the Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA).  It remains to be seen how receptive the national office will be to requests to reconsider prevailing wage determinations, including the assignment of occupational categories and wage levels.



Share/Save/Bookmark

       
Copyright © 2010 Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.
Disclosure: Law firm web sites such as this one are considered 'Attorney Advertising' by the State Bar of New York.