Archive for May, 2009

H-1B Cap: Nothing New is Big News

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

Those of our readers following the H-1B cap saga this year know that filings are down and scrutiny is up for all H-1B petitions this year.

USCIS just released its latest update on the “cap count,” and the remarkable news is that only about 500 applications have been added to the cap since the initial filing period in April.   Since many H-1Bs are hired after graduating from US schools, the current economic situation is clearly depressing demand for professional workers.   As some have noted, this natural decrease in demand for foreign national workers whenever the US economy is slower means that the statutory caps, which limit such workers when the economy is growing, are not really necessary.

Share

DOL Delays iCERT Effective date

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

I previously posted about the DOL’s iCERT system, its new “portal” through which employers could prepare and file Labor Condition Applications for H-1B petitions.  DOL previously announced that the iCERT system would become mandatory as of this Friday (right now, while we can file LCAs through iCERT, we can also file them through the existing system).

Because of the large number of errors and glitches identified by users of the iCERT portal in the three weeks since it became available to file LCAs, DOL told the American Immigration Lawyers Association, NAFSA and other stakeholders today that it would be announcing a delayed effective date for when the new iCERT portal would become mandatory.

According to AILA, June 30, 2009 will be the new date for iCERT to be the exclusive means to obtain a certified LCA for H-1B purposes.  Until then, either iCERT or the existing LCA Online system can be used to file LCAs.

Share

Supreme Court Limits the Scope of the Aggravated Identity Theft Statute in Flores-Figueroa v. United States

Monday, May 11th, 2009

One of the most pervasive problems in worksite enforcement is the ready availability of fraudulent documents to those who would work without authorization.  Employers need only check that the documents “reasonably appear to be genuine;” the government’s E-Verify program is meant to provide another layer of inquiry through which employers can access government databases to verify that a document presented matches information in the government’s databases – for example, that the social security number on the card is not made-up or matched to a different person’s name.


One of the government’s enforcement strategies has been to charge workers whose fraudulent documents happen to match information from an actual person with “aggravated identity theft,” rather than solely with misuse of documents for an immigration purpose (i.e. completing an I-9).  On May 4, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Flores-Figueroa v. United States, overturning the government’s ability to use that particular criminal charge in the I-9 context without proving that the worker knew the identification was not only fraudulent, but also matched the information of a real person.

(more…)

Share

Terminated Nonimmigrants: What Advice?

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

An all-to-frequent question we have been answering these days is how to advise a work-based nonimmigrant in H, L, E or similar status who is terminated.

We have a resource for employers and terminated employees specifically written with respect to the H category, and much of the advice in that document, from the employee’s perspective, applies equally to all employment-based nonimmigrants.  The most important rule is that a terminated nonimmigrant does not have any formal “grace period” or fixed period of time during which their status is considered valid.  Nonimmigrants are admitted to the US for a particular activity – workers to work, students to study, visitors to visit – and as soon as they stop that activity, they are out of status.  Note that periods of severance are not periods of employment, and USCIS generally does not regard a person receiving status as being “in status.”

Unfortunately, this rule means terminated nonimmigrants need to deal with the situation immediately – and there is no “one size fits all” solution that we can recommend.  They can seek a change of status to another status they qualify for, such as student status or visitor status; make arrangements to depart as soon as possible; or may have other options depending on their personal situation.  Therefore, the best advice to a terminated nonimmigrant is to refer him or her to one of our attorneys for a detailed consultation, during which we can help develop a strategy to deal with the immigration consequences of the termination.

Share

H-1B Cap News: Still Plenty of H’s, But Increased Scrutiny

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

USCIS has published its latest estimates of filings subject to the “H Caps.”  They report receipts of approximately 45,000 petitions subject to the 65,000 cap, virtually unchanged in two weeks.

At the same time that fewer petitions are being received by USCIS, the agency is subjecting th0se that are filed to increased scrutiny.  Companies are facing Requests For Evidence asking for significant amounts of documentation that the job they are offering exists and will exist in October.  Now more than ever, ensuring that initial H petitions are well documented (some would say over-documented) is necessary to have success in H petition filings.

Share

Department of Homeland Security Issues New Worksite Enforcement Directive Focusing on Employers Rather Than Employees

Monday, May 4th, 2009

We’ve added a Client Alert to our main website about the new approach to enforcement the Department of Homeland Security announced recently. The DHS says enforcement efforts will now focus more on criminal prosecutions of the employers of unauthorized workers, rather than the workers themselves. This change in strategy is in keeping with the call to end or restrict the large-scale worksite raids of the Bush administration, which resulted in prosecution of many more employees than employers.

Share

Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer LLP Launches New Worksite Compliance Micro-Site: worksite-compliance.com

Friday, May 1st, 2009

Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer LLP is pleased to announce the launch of our new micro-site entirely dedicated to providing employers with “need-to-have” resources to stay in compliance with US Immigration laws. The new site provides extensive information to businesses on federal and state worksite compliance laws, I-9 enforcement, E-Verify, Social Security no-match letters and H-1B Labor Condition Application compliance issues.

Special features on the site include:

·         An I-9 Desk Reference Handbook (covering Employee Verification, Employer Sanctions and Anti-discrimination laws)

·         An E-Verify State-by-State Legislation Survey.

The new site is www.worksite-compliance.com.  We hope that you find our new site helpful and informative.

Share
       
Copyright © 2013 Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.
Disclosure: Law firm web sites such as this one are considered 'Attorney Advertising' by the State Bar of New York.