Archive for February, 2010

Department of State Proposes Fee Increases for Consular Services

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

On February 9, 2010, the Department of State (DOS) issued a proposed rule to increase fees for certain consular services. DOS announced that it is adjusting the fees in light of an independent cost of service study, which found that the government is not fully covering its costs for providing consular services under the current fee structure.

 
There are two important fee changes listed in the proposed rule. First, the proposed rule establishes a tiered application processing fee for immigrant visas depending on the visa category, as determined by the cost of processing that particular category of visa. Second, the proposed rule increases the adult passport book application fee from $55 to $70.

 
1. Immigrant Visa Processing Fees

 
DOS is changing the fee for processing an immigrant visa from $355 for all immigrant visas, to a four-tiered fee based on estimates for each category of immigrant visa, as applications for certain categories of immigrant visas cost more to process than others. As a reminder, immigrant visa fees are collected by the DOS when applicants apply for an immigrant visa at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate abroad, rather than applying for a green card in the U.S.

 
The new tiered system will have the following cost changes:

 
· Family-based (immediate relative and preference) visas, which are processed on the basis of an I-130, I-600 or I-800 petition, will be $330.

· Employment-based visas, which are processed on the basis of an I-140 petition, will increase significantly to $720.

· Other immigrant visa applications, including for I-360 self- petitioners, special immigrant visa applicants and all others, will have a fee of $305.

· Winners of the Diversity Visa lottery who apply for immigrant visas will increase from $375 to $440 based on estimates for an FY 2010 workload projection of 81,000 applications.

· DOS also is increasing the immigrant visa security surcharge, which almost all applicants must pay, from $45 to $74 to cover increased security costs.

 
2. Fees for U.S. Passports

 
DOS is increasing the application fee for a passport book for an adult (age 17 and older) from $55 to $70. The application fee for a passport book for a minor (age 16 and younger) will remain at $40. DOS also is increasing the security surcharge from $20 to $40 as well, in order to cover the costs of increased border security which includes, but is not limited to, enhanced biometric features in the passport book itself.

 
Additional fee increases for passport services:

 
· Extra pages – In the past, DOS provided extra pages in a customer’s passport, to which foreign countries’ visas may then be affixed, at no charge. DOS now will charge $82 for this service.

· Passport Card – DOS has decided to raise the adult passport card application fee from $20 to just $30, and the minor passport card application fee from $10 to just $15.

· Documentation for Renunciation of Citizenship – The cost study found that documenting a U.S. citizen’s renunciation of citizenship is extremely costly, requiring American consular officers overseas to spend substantial amounts of time to accept, process, and adjudicate cases. A new fee of $450 will be established to help defray a small portion of the total cost to the government of documenting the renunciation of citizenship.
When will the fees increase?

 
DOS intends to implement this proposed rule, and initiate collection of the new fees, as soon as practicable following the expiration of the 30-day public comment period following publication in the Federal Register on February 9, 2010, and after the DOS has had the opportunity to fully consider any public comments received. Klasko will alert our clients who may potentially be impacted by the increased fees.

Share/Save/Bookmark

USCIS Clarifies H-1B Issues for TARP Fund Employers

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the stimulus bill into law, which contained the Employ American Workers Act (EAWA). This law stops U.S. employers from displacing U.S. workers when hiring H-1B workers if the employer received funding through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).

If an H-1B employer received TARP funding, the employer must make attestations on its Labor Condition Application (LCA) filed with the Department of Labor (DOL), including attesting to good faith recruitment efforts and having hired any qualified US workers, prior to filing an H-1B petition. Any company that received TARP funding and seeks to hire H-1B workers is considered to be an “H-1B dependent employer” under EAWA.

H-1B dependent employers, including all TARP recipients with outstanding obligations, make these additional attestations on an LCA:

• The employer has taken or will take good faith steps meeting industry-wide standards to recruit U.S. workers.
• The employer will offer compensation that is at least as great as those offered to the H-1B worker.
• The employer has offered or will offer the job to any U.S. worker who applied and is equally or better qualified for the job.
• The employer will not displace any similarly employed U.S. worker within the period beginning 90 days before and ending 90 days after the date of filing the I-129 petition.
• The employer will not place an H-1B worker at another employer unless it has inquired whether the other employer has displaced or will displace a U.S. worker within 90 days before or after the placement of the H-1B worker. This is called the “secondary displacement inquiry.”

What if your company received TARP Funding?

H-1B employers first must identify if they have received TARP funding, as USCIS contacts the Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and other relevant agencies to identify employers who have received TARP funding. Employers must accurately complete Form I-129W, H-1B Data Collection and Filing Fee Exemption Supplement, which asks the employer if it is H-1B dependent. You should alert your Klasko Law attorney if your company received TARP funding, as additional recruitment steps may be necessary before you file an H-1B petition for a new H-1B employee. This is particularly important in light of the approaching April 1, 2010 deadline for filing new H-1B petitions with an October 1, 2010 start date.

If your company has received TARP funding, EAWA applies to any H-1B petition filed on or after February 17, 2009 for employment by a “new employer.” Any TARP recipient seeking to hire a new H-1B employee with no prior employment relationship is subject to EAWA. This includes “concurrent employment,” where an employer hires a new employee who continues work with another employer in H-1B status. EAWA also applies even if you filed the H-1B petition prior to February 17, 2009, but the new H-1B employee commences employment after February 17, 2009.

EAWA does not apply to H-1B extension petitions for a current employee with the same employer. It also does not apply to an H-1B petition to change the status of a current U.S. work-authorized employee to H-1B status with the same employer. For example, if the employer has an employee in L-1 status, and the employer wishes to change the employee’s status to H-1B, EAWA would not apply.

EAWA remains in effect until February 17, 2011.

What if We Repaid Our Funding?

USCIS recently confirmed that if you received TARP funding, but have repaid your obligations, an employer will no longer be considered H-1B Dependent. Employers who have repaid their obligations should answer “no” to Question A.1.d. on the H-1B Data Collection and Filing Fee Exemption Supplement. USCIS also encourages employers to submit evidence that their TARP obligations have been repaid to avoid processing delays.

Share/Save/Bookmark

H-1B Nonimmigrant Workers Denied Entry at Newark Airport

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP has learned that Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) officials have been issuing expedited removal orders to certain H-1B nonimmigrant workers seeking entry at Newark airport in New Jersey.  H-1Bs that have been targeted include those working at IT consulting firms and those posted at third-party worksites. 

 
Expedited removal in which the government covers the costs of the return airline ticket, bars the individual from reentering the U.S. for a period of five years.  CBP officers are authorized to institute expedited removal when they believe that an individual is entering the U.S. in violation of the terms and conditions of the visa.  Reports from those impacted state that they were put into secondary inspection by CBP officers and coerced into signing statements that contain falsehoods.  These statements were then used as the basis for their removal.  Interestingly, the H-1Bs were not advised that they could withdraw their applications to enter the U.S. and return home at their own expense.  This option would have allowed the nonimmigrants to apply for a new H-1B visa stamp either with the same or a new H1B employer and reenter the U.S. at anytime thereafter.

 
Entering nonimmigrants are often placed into secondary inspection if CBP officers wish to question the alien as to the intent of their stay in the U.S.  Although intimidating, it is critical for nonimmigrants to ensure that they answer all questions honestly and accurately, as only erroneous expedited removal orders can be vacated. Unfortunately, aliens seeking entry at CBP do not have a right to counsel and therefore, must be extremely precise when articulating their reasons for entry to CBP.  It is believed that CBP in Newark is instituting these actions in response to the recent USCIS memo which limits the definition of the employer-employee relationship and in particular targets IT consulting companies and “job shops.” 

Klasko Law will continue to provide updates on this issue.

Share/Save/Bookmark

       
Copyright © 2010 Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.
Disclosure: Law firm web sites such as this one are considered 'Attorney Advertising' by the State Bar of New York.