Archive for March, 2010

USCIS Retracts E-Verify Federal Contractor FAQs

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

Last week, USCIS issued a “Frequently Asked Questions” document to help federal contractors with the E-Verify process. The FAQ answered questions that arose from the E-Verify webinar sponsored by Department of Homeland Security in September 2009. The FAQ clarified setting up E-Verify accounts, employer’s responsibilities under the system, employee’s rights under the system, and the record keeping requirements for E-Verify, amongst a host of other specific questions.

 
On March 25, 2010, however, USCIS retracted the FAQ for federal contractors that were distributed on March 17, 2010 to webinar participants. According to USCIS, the FAQs were sent in error and that updated FAQs will be posted to the E-Verify website after DHS clarifies several points.

 
Under federal law that became effective June 30, 2009, federal contractors are required to participate in E-Verify. Failure to comply with the Federal Contractor Rule can result in loss of federal contracts and debarment from future federal contracts. To learn more about E-Verify, please visit our worksite enforcement website at: http://www.worksite-compliance.com/e-verify.php, or contact your Klasko Law attorney.

Share

E-Verify Agrees To Share Information About Employees and Employers With the Department of Justice’s Office of Special Counsel, Civil Rights Division

Friday, March 26th, 2010

In a move sure to capture the attention of employers using the E-Verify system, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) to share information with the Civil Rights Division, Office of Special Counsel for immigration Related Unfair Employment Practices (“OSC”), which is a part of the of U.S. Department of Justice.   Under the MOA, which went into effect on March 17, 2010,  USCIS will share with OSC data obtained from queries run through E-Verify, which will allow OSC to identify potential violations of the anti-discrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”).    USCIS will also provide employer information to OSC, as necessary, when employers have engaged in potential misuse or abuse of E-Verify.

OSC is responsible for enforcing the anti-discrimination provisions of the INA.  The types of discrimination and violations covered in these provisions include:  (1) citizenship status discrimination, (2) national origin discrimination, (3) unfair documentary practices during the employment eligibility verification process (document abuse) and (4) retaliation.   Under the MOA, USCIS will refer to OSC allegations involving potential discrimination resulting from employer misuse or abuse of E-Verify.  OSC will analyze the information to identify potential patterns or practices of discrimination through the misuse of E-Verify, or by investigating individual claims of discrimination.

The announcement of the information sharing agreement coincides with the announcement by USCIS of two additional initiatives intended to “enhance” E-Verify.   The first is the creation of an Employee Hotline, available starting on April 5, 2010, intended to address employee inquiries and complaints.   The hotline will provide general information to employees about E-Verify and completing Form I-9, and will also provide an option for employees to contest an E-Verify case or file a complaint regarding possible discrimination or employer misuse of E-Verify.   The second initiative was the creation of two videos, available now on dhs.gov and Youtube.  The first is directed towards employers, to help them understand their responsibilities under E-Verify, while the other directed towards employees to inform them of their rights when working for employers enrolled in E-Verify.  

The USCIS has indicated that the purpose behind these two initiatives, and the information sharing agreement with OSC, is to strengthen the efficiency and accuracy of the E-Verify system.   The message to employers, however, is that participation in E-Verify now comes with the potential for additional scrutiny.   In order to avoid a potential claim of system misuse, or discrimination, employers should take steps to ensure that employees responsible for submitting E-Verify queries on the company’s behalf understand the implications of using the system, and its requirements.   Further, employers must ensure that employees responsible for verifying the eligibility of other employees understand the anti-discrimination provisions of the INA, both by providing training and by making available to those employees internal and/or external resources capable of providing assistance and advice when questions arise.

Share

USCIS Requires Certified LCAs for All H-1B Filings as of March 10, 2010

Friday, March 12th, 2010

USCIS issued an update reminding employers to file H-1B petitions with certified Labor Condition Applications (LCAs).  Due to processing delays associated with Department of Labor’s (DOL) “iCERT” system that certifies LCAs, USCIS temporarily allowed H-1B petitions to be filed with uncertified LCAs.  This temporary procedure went into effect on November 5, 2009 and expired on March 9, 2010.  USCIS announced that it will not extend the period in which it temporarily accepted H-1B petitions filed with uncertified LCAs.   As of March 10, 2010, USCIS will reject any H-1B petition filed without an LCA certified by DOL. 

 
Since the DOL implemented the iCERT system, there have been numerous delays in obtaining certification of LCAs.  As we previously blogged, while it was known that iCERT would eliminate same day LCA approvals, the DOL originally anticipated that it could take up to seven business days to certify the LCA. However, since its implementation the iCERT system has experienced a number of technical glitches that have resulted in delays in obtaining certified LCAs beyond the seven day period.  With April 1, 2010 fast approaching, employers should contact their Klasko Law attorney immediately if they wish to sponsor an employee for an H-1B visa in the 2011 fiscal year.

Share

NY State Court Holds that Student Violated Status by Working at a Different Campus

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

On February 5, 2010, the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, of New York held that an F-1 student violated his status by tutoring at another campus location of the university that he attended. The student was pursuing a Master’s degree at the State University of NY at Binghamton. While attending school at the Binghamton campus of SUNY, he also tutored students attending the State University of NY at Morrisville, some 70 miles away. The student argued that he was engaging in “on campus” employment, which is allowed under the regulations found at 8 CFR §214.2(f)(9)(i). That regulation requires the employment must be performed on the school’s campus or at an off-campus location that is “educationally affiliated with the school.”

 
The court found in favor of the school. The court rejected the student’s argument that tutoring at the Morrisville campus was “on campus” employment because both campuses were part of the SUNY network. Specifically, the court stated that “the tutor position could not have been on-campus employment as SUNY Morrisville – the place where petitioner was employed – is located almost 70 miles from the SUNY Binghamton campus.” The court also found that the student’s tutor position “does not appear to have any educational affiliation with SUNY Binghamton’s curriculum in a manner contemplated by these regulations.” The court recognized that both schools were in the SUNY network, but that they are “separate and distinct educational institutions with differentiated and designated missions.”

 
Klasko reminds students that they always check with their designated school official (DSO) prior to accepting off-campus employment in order to maintain valid F-1 status.

 
A copy of the decision can be read at: decisions.courts.state.ny.us/ad3/Decisions/2010/507473.pdf

Share

PA Employer Sentenced for Hiring Illegal Aliens

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

Employers in Pennsylvania should heed the warnings of this story – it can be quite costly to hire illegal workers. Robert Kramer of Philadelphia was sentenced to one year of probation, including six months of home confinement, after he plead guilty to charges of knowingly employing illegal immigrants at a chain of car washes. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) investigated Kramer, which turned up over 50 illegal immigrants at Car Care, Inc. The business operated more than 50 car washes in six states, including Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

According to ICE, Kramer hired undocumented workers, gave those workers the names of former employees, and then paid the undocumented workers with checks in the names of the former employees. U.S. District Court Judge Darnell C. Jones, II, ordered Kramer to pay a $75,000 fine to be paid with personal, not corporate, funds. Judge Jones also ordered Kramer to perform, at the Court’s direction, community service.

Increased investigations and I-9 audits, coupled with ICE’s prerogative to collect civil penalties from employers and individuals, necessitate the maintenance of organized I-9 files.

For more information on worksite compliance, ICE enforcement actions, and how these developments impact your business please visit our website www.worksite-compliance.com or consult with a Klasko Law attorney.

Share

ICE Issues More Notices of Inspection

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Last week, Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued a press release stating that it will send another 180 Notices of Inspection (NOIs) to businesses in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas and Tennessee. The notices alert the employers that ICE will be coming to their workplace to inspect I-9 records. This marks another round of inspections by ICE, which in 2009 issued 1000 NOIs to employers around the country. Acting special agent in charge of the ICE Office of Investigations in New Orleans, Raymond R. Parmer, Jr., stated that “ICE is committed to establishing a meaningful I-9 inspection program to promote compliance with the law. This effort is a first step in ICE’s long-term strategy to address and deter illegal employment.”

Employers around the country should expect ICE to issue more NOIs throughout 2010. As ICE explained, in 2009 it “implemented a new, comprehensive strategy to reduce the demand for illegal employment and protect employment opportunities for the nation’s lawful workforce. Under this strategy, ICE is focusing its resources on the auditing and investigation of employers suspected of cultivating illegal workplaces by knowingly employing illegal workers.”

Klasko reminds employers that it is critical to keep accurate I-9 records. Form I-9 requires employers to determine the employment authorization of hires by reviewing and recording the employee’s identity documents and determining whether the documents reasonably appear to be genuine and related to the individual. Employers are required to maintain an original Form I-9 and supporting documentation for all current employees. Employers also must retain an I-9 file for at least 3 years from the employee’s hire date, or 1 year after the employee’s termination date, whichever is longer.

For more information on worksite enforcement issues, please visit our website at: http://www.worksite-compliance.com.

Share
       
Copyright © 2013 Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.
Disclosure: Law firm web sites such as this one are considered 'Attorney Advertising' by the State Bar of New York.