Archive for August, 2010

Kentucky Service Center Audit of Nonimmigrant Visa Petitions, Including Unannounced Telephonic Contact with Employers

Monday, August 30th, 2010

The Department of State (DOS) Visa Office announced that the Kentucky Consular Center (KCC) has started to verify information submitted in nonimmigrant petitions to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) through telephonic contact with employers. 

In November 2007, the DOS required Consular posts to verify information contained in approved nonimmigrant visa petitions through the Petition Information Management Service (PIMS).  PIMS is operated by the KCC.  When a nonimmigrant petition is filed with USCIS, a duplicate copy of the petition is scanned into the PIMS system so that a U.S. Embassy or Consulate abroad can access petition information through PIMS and the Consular Consolidated Database (CCD) when the petition beneficiary applies for a visa stamp.  The PIMS record is the primary proof that a nonimmigrant visa petition is approved.  Additionally, the PIMS record may contain information from DOS’ Fraud Prevention Unit. 

It has come to the attention of the DOS that the lack of information on the petitioner in the USCIS Computer Linked Information Management System (CLAIMS) system sometimes makes a CCD record incomplete.  Therefore, the DOS will be conducting its own investigation of both petitioners and beneficiaries of nonimmigrant visa petitions.  To verify petitioners, the KCC will review of the company website, company contact information, and use of Google earth to confirm that an office exists in an appropriate physical location. The DOS has stated that the KCC will not normally re-verify the petitioner information for two years. 

To verify factual information about the beneficiary of the petition, the KCC will make random telephonic contact with the petitioning employer.  The telephonic contact by KCC is unannounced and should be anticipated to occur shortly after the petition is transferred to the KCC from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.  The DOS has designated 15 contractors to conduct the telephonic interviews.  The contractors will contact the petitioning employer, and ask to speak with an authorized representative.  They will ask a series of questions including, but not limited to the following:

1. Whether the petitioner, in fact, submitted the petition;

2. When was the petitioner incorporated;

3. Where is the physical location of the petitioner;

4. Number of employees;

5. Names of shareholders;

6. Location of Attorney of Record;

7. General information regarding the petitioner’s operations and business plan.

Klasko wants to remind employers of the following points for the KCC telephonic interviews:

1. Request the name of the KCC contractor and confirm the credentials of the contractor with the KCC [(606) 526-7500] prior to providing any information. 

2. Contact your Klasko law attorney to advise us of the telephonic contact by the KCC contractor.

3. Do not speak with government agents or contractors without a witness present. Both the witness and the interviewee should prepare notes of what questions were asked and label them “Privileged and Confidential/Prepared at the Direction of Counsel,” and submit them to your Klasko law attorney for review and retention.

4. Retain complete copies of your I-129 petitions and supporting documents in a confidential file maintained by the designated company official for easy access during a contractor call. 

5. Never guess at the answer to a question about the petition.  If the employer is unsure about some requested information, the employer should indicate that he/she will follow up with the KCC contractor to provide accurate information after such information is obtained.

Employers are reminded that the investigations conducted by the KCC are separate and apart from the investigations conducted by the Fraud Detection and National Security Unit (FDNS) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  DHS will continue to conduct its own fraud investigations using the FDNS unit.  FDNS conducts site visits of petitioning employers in an effort to combat fraudulent petitions.  Employers are reminded to contact their Klasko law attorney if they receive a site visit from a Department of Homeland Security contractor.

Share

Important Resource for Adjustment of Status Applicants

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

All applicants for permanent residence are required to submit Form I-693, which is completed by a civil surgeon pursuant to the results of a medical examination.  As an adjustment of status applicant, it is important that you are familiar with the requirements of the medical exam.   Understanding the USCIS medical examination requirements is particularly important for pregnant woman or those individuals that have a history of adverse reactions to medical tests.   Max Sarinsky of our New York office has compiled an important resource for adjustment of status applicants where they can learn more about the medical exam.  To view the resource please visit the following link:  Medical Examination and Vaccination Record: Best Practices and Frequently Asked Questions.

Share

PA., N.J. MOVE FORWARD WITH E-VERIFY; FEDS STEP UP ENFORCEMENT

Friday, August 20th, 2010

On July 30, 2010, Elise Fialkowski, partner at Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP, published an article entitled, “Pa., N.J. Move Forward With E-Verify; Feds Step Up Enforcement” in The Legal Intelligencer.  In her article, Elise discusses recent legislation introduced into the Pennsylvania and New Jersey legislatures that, if passed, would require employers in those states to use E-Verify.  The article also discussed Immigration & Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) plan for increased I-9 enforcement.  You can view a complete copy of the article published in The Legal Intelligencer here.

Share

An Update on Recent Developments in H-1B Law

Friday, August 20th, 2010

On Aug. 13, 2010, President Obama signed into law Public Law 111-230, which contains provisions to increase certain H-1B and L-1 petition fees. This law requires the submission of an additional fee of $2,000 for certain H-1B petitions and $2,250 for certain L-1A and L-1B petitions postmarked on or after Aug. 14, 2010, and will remain in effect through Sept. 30, 2014.  

These additional fees apply to petitioners who employ 50 or more employees in the United States with more than 50 percent of its employees in the United States in H-1B or L (including L-1A, L-1B and L-2) nonimmigrant status.  Petitioners meeting these criteria must submit the fee with an H-1B or L-1 petition filed:

  • Initially to grant an alien nonimmigrant status described in subparagraph (H)(i)(b) or (L) of section 101(a)(15), or 
  • To obtain authorization for an alien having such status to change employers. 

The additional fee, if applicable, is in addition to the base processing fee, the existing Fraud Prevention and Detection Fee, and any applicable American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 (ACWIA) fee, needed to file a petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (Form I-129), as well as any premium processing fees, if applicable.

USCIS plans to issue a revised Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker and instructions on how to comply with the new imminently.  KRSS will continue to update our clients on the implementation of the new law.

(more…)

Share

Checklist for Prospective Investors and Entrepreneurs under U.S. Immigration Laws

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

Potential investors and entrepreneurs are often faced with deciding which among several possible U.S. immigration options they should choose.  These include visa options, such as the E-2 treaty investor visa and the L-1 company transferee visa.  Permanent resident options generally include the multi-national manager petition, the individual EB-5 and the regional center EB-5.

On our website, www.eb5immigration.com, we have provided a tool to structure further discussions with investors and entrepreneurs to aid them in this decision making process.  Checklist for Prospective Investors and Entrepreneurs under U.S. Immigration Laws includes both a Q&A format as well as a chart highlighting differences between the different options.

Investors should not rely on this posting in finalizing their decision making, but rather may find it helpful in structuring discussions with immigration counsel, who can provide the details relevant to each particular investor and entrepreneur.

Share

EB-5 Job Creation: What to Do When Plans Change

Monday, August 16th, 2010

One of the hottest issues in EB-5 adjudications, especially relating to condition removal, is when a “material change” has occurred in the investment project such as to necessitate the filing of a new I-526 petition.  “EB-5 Job Creation: What to Do When Plans Change” posted on our website, www.eb5immigration.com, explores the ramifications of the new CIS policy in this area.  The article contains my suggestion that, if there is a material change in the investment, the appropriate procedure is for the investor to file an amended petition, rather than a new petition as suggested by CIS.  The difference is critical in two respects.  First, a new petition would require a new two year conditional residence period.  Second, a new petition would result in any children who have subsequently reached age 21 to lose conditional residence status and the ability to become a permanent resident.  An amended petition, which is consistent with CIS and legacy INS policies in other areas, would result in neither of these negative ramifications.

Share

New Developments in EB-5

Friday, August 13th, 2010

Although there has been no change in EB-5 law (statute, regulations or precedent decisions), there have been significant changes in, or clarifications of, the USCIS adjudicatory standards relating to EB-5 cases within the last 12 months.  These changes have come about through memoranda (June 17, 2009 and December 11, 2009), as well as through pronouncements at EB-5 stakeholders meetings.

New Developments in EB-5s, posted to www.eb5immigration.com, is a summary of the changes that have occurred in the past year relating to employment creation, interpretation of “new commercial enterprise,” regional centers, targeted employment areas, troubled businesses, the condition removal process, “material change” and other issues relating to investors and investments.

(more…)

Share
       
Copyright © 2013 Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.
Disclosure: Law firm web sites such as this one are considered 'Attorney Advertising' by the State Bar of New York.