Archive for October, 2010

ICE Announces Record Breaking Number of Worksite Enforcement Investigations, Penalties and Fines

Sunday, October 31st, 2010

This month, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Director John Morton announced that ICE’s worksite enforcement numbers have climbed to historic highs with record breaking numbers of I-9 audits, fines and increased criminal prosecution of employers.

ICE announced that since January 2009, it has conducted I-9 audits of more than 3,200 US employers, more than ever before. By comparison, in fiscal year 2009—itself a banner year for I-9 audits–ICE conducted approximately 1400 audits. The audits conducted since January 2009 also resulted in record breaking penalties–ICE debarred 225 companies and individuals from doing business with the federal government and imposed approximately $50 million in sanctions for worksite enforcement violations. The increase in audits and sanctions is dramatic–ICE explained that the figures for just this year are higher than the total amount of audits and debarments for the entire Bush administration.

ICE also actively pursued criminal enforcement of employers–in fiscal year 2010, ICE charged 180 business owners, employers, managers, or supervisors with hiring illegal aliens, up from 135 in fiscal 2008 and 114 in fiscal 2009.

ICE pledged to continue aggressive enforcement against employers stating “enforcing worksite laws not only promotes fairness in the workplace, but it also substantially reduces the incentive for aliens to enter the United States illegally.”

These record breaking numbers reflect implementation of a new worksite enforcement strategy first announced by the Obama administration in April 2009. Rather than large scale raids, the new focus is on employers. As part of this strategy, ICE identified I-9 audits as an important administrative tool in building criminal cases, issuing civil penalties such as fines and bringing employers into compliance with the law. Not only will ICE use traditional criminal enforcement methods, but the guidance to the field emphasizes that administrative tools will be used “to advance criminal cases, and in the absence of criminal charges, to support the imposition of civil fines and other available penalties.” Indeed, the guidance makes clear that the “the most important administrative tool is the Notice of Inspection (NOI) and the resulting Form I-9 audit” as it will not only support the imposition of civil fines and other available penalties, but it “will often serve as an important first step in the criminal investigation and prosecution of employers.”

Consistent with this use of I-9 audits as the key administrative tool, ICE announced a nationwide initiative to audit employers’ Form I-9 employment eligibility verification records. As part of this initiative, in the first week of July 2009 alone, ICE issued Notices of Inspection (NOI) to over 650 employers across the country. In comparison, only 503 Notices of Inspection were issued in all of fiscal year 2008. As explained in earlier postings, ICE continued such widespread audits throughout the year, ultimately resulting in over 3200 audits. This widespread enforcement initiative is much different than any in the past. In the past, initiatives often focused on the most likely offenders—employers in industries such as meat-packing, construction, landscaping and manufacturing—commonly believed to regularly hire unauthorized workers. While these businesses were included within the I-9 audits, the reach was much broader to include a wide variety of businesses throughout the entire country. The message is clear—no employer is safe from an I-9 audit and investigation.

In order to avoid potential liability, employers are well advised to develop and implement detailed I-9 policies and practices. ICE recommends that employers, at a minimum, establish an internal training program, with annual updates, on how to manage completion of Form I-9 and how to detect fraudulent use of documents in the I-9 process; permit the I-9 and any E-Verify process to be conducted only by individuals who have received training; and include a review of the completed I-9 and documents by a second person as part of each employee’s verification to minimize the potential for a single individual to subvert the process. Regular audits–conducted before ICE comes knocking on the door– are also key to obtain compliance and limit liability.

For more information, contact Elise Fialkowski at Efialkowski@klaskolaw.com

Share

U.S. News & World Report Names KRSS Top Tier

Thursday, October 21st, 2010

Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer is pleased to announce that the firm received the highest ranking (Tier 1) for Immigration Law in both New York and Philadelphia in the first ever, just released U.S. News and World Report and Best Lawyers “Best Law Firm” rankings.

The rankings, available online at www.usnews.com/bestlawfirms, are based on a combination of “hard data with peer reviews and client assessments” according to Steven Naifeh, President of Best Lawyers.  Every Fortune 100 company participated in the survey.  “Achieving a high ranking is a special distinction that signals a unique combination of excellence and breadth of expertise” as stated in the press release issued by U.S. News.

Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP is one of the country’s leading business immigration and nationality law firms.  The firm has offices in Philadelphia and New York and is known for its top caliber representation of health care institutions, universities and colleges, businesses and individuals in a wide range of immigration law matters.  In addition to USNWR, the firm has been recognized in the prestigious Chambers Global: The World’s Leading Lawyers for Business (Chambers and Partners) as one of the top 5 business immigration law firms in the country.

Share

Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill Introduced Into the Senate

Friday, October 1st, 2010

On September 30, 2010, Senators Menendez (D-NY) and Leahy (D-VT) introduced the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2010 (S. 3932) into the U.S. Senate.  The bill is the first comprehensive immigration reform bill introduced into Congress since 2007.  It contains provisions for enhanced border security, mandatory employment verification through E-Verify, fixes to the business and family visa systems, a legalization plan for undocumented aliens, and stiffer penalties on illegal immigration.

Highlights of the bill include:

  • Clarification that the power to regulate immigration resides with the federal government, not states and localities;
  • Provision of common‐sense rules governing the detention of families, elderly or ill immigrants, crime victims, and other vulnerable populations;
  • Mandatory use of an employment verification system for all employers within five years;
  • Creation of a new nonimmigrant visa program (H‐2C) to address gaps in existing worker programs that have lead to undocumented aliens.  H‐2C workers are eligible to apply for green cards after having worked in the U.S. for four years, or immediately if they are sponsored by their employer;
  • Assurance that the number of family and employment green cards authorized by Congress do not expire because of processing delays;
  • Expansion of the share of visas that each country can access within existing quotas that limit overall immigration;
  • Exemption for certain immigrants from counting against the annual green card quotas so that they can immediately reunite with loved ones in the U.S., including spouses and minor children of green card holders;
  • Revision of the unlawful presence bars so that individuals with family ties are not permanently banished from the U.S.;
  • Creation of a Lawful Prospective Immigrant (LPI) status for non‐criminal undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. since 9/30/10.  In order to transition from LPI status to Legal Permanent Residency, applicants are required to wait at least six years; pay taxes and a $1000 fine; learn English and U.S. civics; and undergo additional background checks. They will not obtain green cards before those who were waiting in line to immigrate as of date of enactment; and
  • Incorporation of the DREAM Act, which creates a path to legal status for individuals who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children, provided they meet age and other criteria and enroll in college or the U.S. military.

Klasko will continue to track the status of this bill on our blog.

Share

Abercrombie & Fitch Fined After I-9 Audit

Friday, October 1st, 2010

On September 28, 2010, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced that it reached a $1,047,110 fine settlement with the clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch for I-9 violations.  The settlement was reached after ICE conducted an audit of the company’s I-9 records in November 2008 for stores located in Michigan. 

Abercrombie & Fitch used electronic software to complete the I-9 forms and retain the appropriate records as required by the Immigration & Nationality Act.  The audit revealed numerous deficiencies in the I-9 software that the company had selected.  Since the initial investigation, Abercrombie & Fitch has taken steps to cure the deficiencies in its I-9 procedures to ensure that future violations do not occur. 

In its press release about the settlement, Brian M. Moskowitz, special agent in charge of ICE HSI for Ohio and Michigan, stated that, “Employers are responsible not only for the people they hire but also for the internal systems they choose to utilize to manage their employment process and those systems must result in effective compliance…We are pleased to see Abercrombie working diligently to complete the implementation of an effective compliance system; however, we know that there are other companies who are not doing so. This settlement should serve as a warning to other companies that may not yet take the employment verification process seriously or provide it the attention it warrants.”  The I-9 regulations provide that if the employer uses an electronic I-9 system and that system does not meet the standards for data capture and record-keeping, ICE may invalidate the I-9s, leaving employers like Abercrombie vulnerable to expansive fines.

Klasko reminds employers that selecting an appropriate software platform is essential for those companies making the transition to electronic completion and storage of the Form I-9.  If an employer chooses to move to an electronic I-9 compliance system, the software must meet certain standards to capture the required data and retain the same content as the paper I-9.  Your Klasko Law attorney is integral in both sending requests for proposals to electronic I-9 vendors and determining whether all of the elements of the paper I-9 are present in the software platform.  For more information, visit our Worksite Compliance website and contact your Klasko Law attorney.

Share
       
Copyright © 2013 Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.
Disclosure: Law firm web sites such as this one are considered 'Attorney Advertising' by the State Bar of New York.