Archive for the ‘Agency Updates’ Category

Department of State Proposes Fee Increases for Consular Services

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

On February 9, 2010, the Department of State (DOS) issued a proposed rule to increase fees for certain consular services. DOS announced that it is adjusting the fees in light of an independent cost of service study, which found that the government is not fully covering its costs for providing consular services under the current fee structure.

There are two important fee changes listed in the proposed rule. First, the proposed rule establishes a tiered application processing fee for immigrant visas depending on the visa category, as determined by the cost of processing that particular category of visa. Second, the proposed rule increases the adult passport book application fee from $55 to $70.

1. Immigrant Visa Processing Fees

DOS is changing the fee for processing an immigrant visa from $355 for all immigrant visas, to a four-tiered fee based on estimates for each category of immigrant visa, as applications for certain categories of immigrant visas cost more to process than others. As a reminder, immigrant visa fees are collected by the DOS when applicants apply for an immigrant visa at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate abroad, rather than applying for a green card in the U.S.

The new tiered system will have the following cost changes:

· Family-based (immediate relative and preference) visas, which are processed on the basis of an I-130, I-600 or I-800 petition, will be $330.

· Employment-based visas, which are processed on the basis of an I-140 petition, will increase significantly to $720.

· Other immigrant visa applications, including for I-360 self- petitioners, special immigrant visa applicants and all others, will have a fee of $305.

· Winners of the Diversity Visa lottery who apply for immigrant visas will increase from $375 to $440 based on estimates for an FY 2010 workload projection of 81,000 applications.

· DOS also is increasing the immigrant visa security surcharge, which almost all applicants must pay, from $45 to $74 to cover increased security costs.

2. Fees for U.S. Passports

DOS is increasing the application fee for a passport book for an adult (age 17 and older) from $55 to $70. The application fee for a passport book for a minor (age 16 and younger) will remain at $40. DOS also is increasing the security surcharge from $20 to $40 as well, in order to cover the costs of increased border security which includes, but is not limited to, enhanced biometric features in the passport book itself.

Additional fee increases for passport services:

· Extra pages - In the past, DOS provided extra pages in a customer’s passport, to which foreign countries’ visas may then be affixed, at no charge. DOS now will charge $82 for this service.

· Passport Card - DOS has decided to raise the adult passport card application fee from $20 to just $30, and the minor passport card application fee from $10 to just $15.

· Documentation for Renunciation of Citizenship – The cost study found that documenting a U.S. citizen’s renunciation of citizenship is extremely costly, requiring American consular officers overseas to spend substantial amounts of time to accept, process, and adjudicate cases. A new fee of $450 will be established to help defray a small portion of the total cost to the government of documenting the renunciation of citizenship.

When will the fees increase?

DOS intends to implement this proposed rule, and initiate collection of the new fees, as soon as practicable following the expiration of the 30-day public comment period following publication in the Federal Register on February 9, 2010, and after the DOS has had the opportunity to fully consider any public comments received. Klasko will alert our clients who may potentially be impacted by the increased fees.

Share/Save/Bookmark

USCIS Clarifies H-1B Issues for TARP Fund Employers

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the stimulus bill into law, which contained the Employ American Workers Act (EAWA). This law stops U.S. employers from displacing U.S. workers when hiring H-1B workers if the employer received funding through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).

If an H-1B employer received TARP funding, the employer must make attestations on its Labor Condition Application (LCA) filed with the Department of Labor (DOL), including attesting to good faith recruitment efforts and having hired any qualified US workers, prior to filing an H-1B petition. Any company that received TARP funding and seeks to hire H-1B workers is considered to be an “H-1B dependent employer” under EAWA.

H-1B dependent employers, including all TARP recipients with outstanding obligations, make these additional attestations on an LCA:

• The employer has taken or will take good faith steps meeting industry-wide standards to recruit U.S. workers.
• The employer will offer compensation that is at least as great as those offered to the H-1B worker.
• The employer has offered or will offer the job to any U.S. worker who applied and is equally or better qualified for the job.
• The employer will not displace any similarly employed U.S. worker within the period beginning 90 days before and ending 90 days after the date of filing the I-129 petition.
• The employer will not place an H-1B worker at another employer unless it has inquired whether the other employer has displaced or will displace a U.S. worker within 90 days before or after the placement of the H-1B worker. This is called the “secondary displacement inquiry.”

What if your company received TARP Funding?

H-1B employers first must identify if they have received TARP funding, as USCIS contacts the Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and other relevant agencies to identify employers who have received TARP funding. Employers must accurately complete Form I-129W, H-1B Data Collection and Filing Fee Exemption Supplement, which asks the employer if it is H-1B dependent. You should alert your Klasko Law attorney if your company received TARP funding, as additional recruitment steps may be necessary before you file an H-1B petition for a new H-1B employee. This is particularly important in light of the approaching April 1, 2010 deadline for filing new H-1B petitions with an October 1, 2010 start date.

If your company has received TARP funding, EAWA applies to any H-1B petition filed on or after February 17, 2009 for employment by a “new employer.” Any TARP recipient seeking to hire a new H-1B employee with no prior employment relationship is subject to EAWA. This includes “concurrent employment,” where an employer hires a new employee who continues work with another employer in H-1B status. EAWA also applies even if you filed the H-1B petition prior to February 17, 2009, but the new H-1B employee commences employment after February 17, 2009.

EAWA does not apply to H-1B extension petitions for a current employee with the same employer. It also does not apply to an H-1B petition to change the status of a current U.S. work-authorized employee to H-1B status with the same employer. For example, if the employer has an employee in L-1 status, and the employer wishes to change the employee’s status to H-1B, EAWA would not apply.

EAWA remains in effect until February 17, 2011.

What if We Repaid Our Funding?

USCIS recently confirmed that if you received TARP funding, but have repaid your obligations, an employer will no longer be considered H-1B Dependent. Employers who have repaid their obligations should answer “no” to Question A.1.d. on the H-1B Data Collection and Filing Fee Exemption Supplement. USCIS also encourages employers to submit evidence that their TARP obligations have been repaid to avoid processing delays.

Share/Save/Bookmark

USCIS Issues Guidance Establishing the “Employee-Employer Relationship” in H-1B Petitions

Monday, January 18th, 2010

On January 13, 2010, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued guidance that imposes enhanced evidentiary requirements on employers filing H-1B petitions.  The memo discusses what evidence must accompany an H-1B petition to establish a valid employer-employee relationship.  The guidance also addresses in what instances the H-1B visa is appropriate for foreign workers who will be placed at third-party client worksites. It also discusses if self-employed individuals, business owners, and independent contractors can continue to qualify for the H-1B.

The federal regulations governing the H-1B classification require that an employer establish that it has an employer-employee relationship with the beneficiary of a petition.  The new memo provides guidance on how USCIS will evaluate if this relationship exists.  The memo lists a variety of factors to be considered when evaluating the petitioner’s right to control the beneficiary, including the manner and extent to which the petitioner actually supervises the beneficiary; the petitioner’s right to control the beneficiary’s daily work and work product; and the petitioner’s right to hire, pay and fire the beneficiary.  USCIS instructs its adjudicators to review the totality of the circumstances when making a final determination of whether the employer-employee relationship exists.  The memo also requires that the petitioner establish that the right to control the beneficiary’s work will continue to exist throughout the duration of the beneficiary’s employment with the petitioner.

Read more after the jump. (more…)

Share/Save/Bookmark

USCIS Grants Temporary Protected Status for Haitians

Monday, January 18th, 2010

The USCIS has announced that Department of Homeland (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano has designated Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for eligible nationals of Haiti.  The Secretary stated that this decision is warranted because of the devastating earthquake and aftershocks which occurred on January 12, 2010.  DHS estimates that approximately 100,000 to 200,000 individuals will be eligible for TPS. 

TPS is a temporary immigration status granted to eligible nationals of a certain country designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security because the country has experienced temporary negative conditions, such as armed conflict or an environmental disaster, that prevent nationals of the country from returning safely or for the country to handle their return adequately. 

The Haitian TPS registration period will run for 180 days.  DHS stated that TPS eligibility will be for an initial period of 18 months.  Applicants who apply for TPS will also be able to apply for an Employment Authorization Document and Advance Parole Travel Document.  Although, these applications will require fees, DHS has stated that they will consider fee waivers for those that can demonstrate that they are unable to pay the costs of the applications.

As proof of nationality, USCIS is looking primarily for a passport (an expired one is acceptable) or birth certificates. For those that have problems with obtaining this documentation, USCIS indicated that secondary evidence would be considered.

On the subject of orphans, USCIS noted that, if adopting parents were in the Haiti at the time of the earthquake, they may go to the U.S. embassy to complete the adoption process, and the government of Haiti will waive the exit visa requirement. DHS and the Department of State are still working on the issues related to adoptions by parents not in Haiti. They urge parents not to travel to Haiti at this time.

Share/Save/Bookmark

New Prevailing Wage Process Implemented by the Department of Labor

Monday, January 11th, 2010

 

The Department of Labor (DOL) has nationalized the process for issuance of prevailing wage determinations used in a variety of immigration applications including PERM, H-1B, H-1B1 (Chile/Singapore), E-3 (Australia), and H-2B.  Beginning January 1, 2010, employers must now apply for prevailing wage determinations to the DOL rather than the state workforce agencies (SWAs).  DOL has indicated that from January 1, 2010 through January 20, 2010 prevailing wage requests must be submitted by mail.  After January 20, 2010 DOL expects that submissions will be able to be made through the iCERT portal.   
 
DOL issued prevailing wage determinations are a mandatory requirement for PERM applications.  The agency has advised employers to submit prevailing wage requests at least 60 days before beginning recruitment or filing an application for labor certification.  Likewise, DOL has indicated that prevailing wage requests using independent wage sources could have lengthier processing times.  As we have reported, the introduction of the 
iCERT system for preparation of LCAs has significantly lengthened preparation time due to technical glitches in the system. It is therefore critical for employers to be aware of these delays, especially if they are filing PERM applications for H-1B nonimmigrant workers who are reaching the end of their fifth year of status and who wish to extend that status beyond the six-year maximum under the provisions of AC21. 

 

In addition to processing delays, it remains to be seen if the validity periods for prevailing wage determinations issued by the DOL will be shorter than those that were issued by local SWAs.


Although prevailing wage determinations from the DOL are not required for H-1B cases, they are preferred by some employers as they provide important safe harbors.  Given the expected delays in DOL processing times for issuance of prevailing wage determinations it is critical that employers identify and begin preparing cap-subject cases for the Fiscal Year 2011 as soon as possible.

 

While DOL policy guidance states that there will be no changes in the way prevailing wages are determined, employers should note that the national office may take a different approach from local SWAs in determining how occupational categories and wage levels are assigned.   DOL has indicated that the national office will entertain requests for redetermination.  Redeterminations will be handled by the Office of Foreign Labor Certification.  Requests to reconsider redeterminations can be submitted to the Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA).  It remains to be seen how receptive the national office will be to requests to reconsider prevailing wage determinations, including the assignment of occupational categories and wage levels.



Share/Save/Bookmark

Modest Movement Seen in February Visa Bulletin

Monday, January 11th, 2010

On January 11, 2010, the Department of State (DOS) released the February 2010 Visa Bulletin.  In February, there will be a three week movement forward in the employment based second category for Chinese nationals to May 22, 2005. Indian nationals will continue to have cut-off dates of January 22, 2005.   

 

In the employment based third preference category for professionals and skilled workers, cut-off dates moved forward to September 22, 2002 for China and worldwide.  India’s cut-off date will remain June 22, 2001.  Mexico will also continue to have a cut-off date of July 1, 2002.

 

The EB-1 category for multinational managers and executives, individuals of extraordinary ability and outstanding professors will remain current. The EB-4 religious worker and EB-5 immigrant investor categories will also remain current. 

 

Share/Save/Bookmark

USCIS Outlines Anti-Fraud Efforts for Employment-based Immigration Petitions

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

In late September, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) sent a letter to USCIS asking what steps the agency was taking to ensure that employers remain in compliance with their obligations to H-1B workers and other sponsored immigrants.  Senator Grassley was particularly concerned about measures in place to ensure that companies placing workers at another employer’s location (for example, IT workers implementing a project for a company’s customer) comply with H-1B wage payment requirements for the actual location where services will be performed.

USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas has responded to Senator Grassley in a letter recently obtained by the American Immigration Lawyers Association.  In it, Director Mayorkas has outlined three main efforts the agency has taken and will take that should be of interest to companies that file petitions for H-1B and other immigrant workers, which are described below. (more…)

Share/Save/Bookmark

ICE Announces More I-9 Audits

Friday, November 20th, 2009

On November 19, 2009, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the agency responsible for investigating immigration violations and enforcing immigration laws at the worksite, announced that it was issuing 1,000 new Notices of Inspections (NOIs) to employers across the country.  In particular, ICE announced that it would target employers located at critical infrastructure sites which include airports, military bases, defense facilities and seaports.  This announcement comes on the heels of a summer which saw the issuance of NOIs to 652 employers across the country.  Secretary of ICE, John Morton stated, “ICE is focused on finding and penalizing employers who believe they can unfairly get ahead by cultivating illegal workplaces.  We are increasing criminal and civil enforcement of immigration-related employment laws and imposing smart, tough employer sanctions to even the playing field for employers who play by the rules.”

Morton went on to explain that the businesses that were to receive the NOIs were selected for inspection as a result of investigative leads and intelligence, as well as their connection to public safety and national security. DHS did not release the names and locations of the businesses to be audited due to the ongoing, law enforcement nature of the investigations.

As Klasko Law reported earlier this year, ICE’s main priority in worksite enforcement actions is to target employers who knowingly hire unauthorized aliens in violation of federal law.  An internal ICE memo released to the public through a freedom of information act earlier this year indicated that the agency views worksite enforcement investigations against employers as the best means of targeting and curbing the root causes of illegal immigration.  As such, ICE has made the criminal prosecution of employers who knowingly hire undocumented workers their top priority.  This includes the imposition of criminal charges against owners, corporate managers, supervisors and others in the management structure.

However, as ICE investigations to date have shown, employers who make inadvertent errors on their I-9 forms or in the verification process are held liable by the agency for civil penalties in the event of an audit.  The current focus on investigations and prosecutions is a significant departure from the days of legacy INS when employers could expect a slap on the wrist in the form on minimal fines as just another cost of doing business.  In this era of increased enforcement, employers must proactively preempt immigration related liabilities.  Employers should conduct internal I-9 audits to identify issues and correct violations.  Part and parcel of these reviews should be an evaluation of the employers’ current record keeping practices, to determine if new training programs are needed for HR personnel.  Immigration counsel can be invaluable during these times in developing best practices including establishing protocols for the verification of the identity and work eligibility of new hires, advising employers on safeguards against discrimination in the I-9 process and advising on the use of E-Verify.

In addition, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and ICE announced that they were launching a new I E-Verify campaign to recognize the 170,000 employers nationwide that have registered for E-Verify.  E-Verify is an internet-based Employment Eligibility Verification System run by USCIS that allows employers to electronically verify the employment eligibility of certain employees. To use E-Verify, an employer enters employee information from the Form I-9 into the web-based system. E-Verify then runs that information against records in the Social Security Administration (SSA) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) databases to confirm whether the employee is authorized to work in the United States.

For more information on worksite compliance, ICE enforcement actions, the E-Verify program and how these developments impact your business please visit our website www.worksite-compliance.com or consult with a Klasko Law attorney.

Share/Save/Bookmark

H-1B Cap: Not a Very Merry Christmas

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

USCIS has just released its newest cap count, informing us today that, as of November 13, just over 55,000 of the 65,000 H-1B petitions available for this fiscal year (from now until October 1, 2010) have been used.

The recent pace of filings means that we can expect that H-1B numbers may be exhausted for the fiscal year by Christmas or New Year’s.  After that, employers will be left with limited alternatives for hiring skilled foreign nationals when US workers are unavailable, at least until the filings for next fiscal year can be made.

Share/Save/Bookmark

HIV Grounds of Inadmissibility Stricken

Friday, November 6th, 2009

On October 30, 2009 President Obama signed into law the Ryan White HIV/ AIDS Treatment Extension Act of 2009 which once again makes aliens with HIV admissible into the U.S.  On November 2, 2009 the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a final rule amending regulations to remove HIV from the list of communicable diseases of public health significance.  The regulation also removed references to HIV from the scope of medical examinations of aliens.  The HHS final rule will become effective January 4, 2010.

 
Earlier this year, the USCIS issued guidance instructing adjudicating officers to hold in abeyance any greencard application which would be denied under current law, if the only ground of inadmissibility is that the applicant has been diagnosed with HIV infection.  Klasko Law will continue to provide updates on the issuance of guidance from USCIS to reflect this change in the law.

Share/Save/Bookmark

       
Copyright © 2010 Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.
Disclosure: Law firm web sites such as this one are considered 'Attorney Advertising' by the State Bar of New York.