Posts Tagged ‘CIR’

Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill Introduced Into the Senate

Friday, October 1st, 2010

On September 30, 2010, Senators Menendez (D-NY) and Leahy (D-VT) introduced the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2010 (S. 3932) into the U.S. Senate.  The bill is the first comprehensive immigration reform bill introduced into Congress since 2007.  It contains provisions for enhanced border security, mandatory employment verification through E-Verify, fixes to the business and family visa systems, a legalization plan for undocumented aliens, and stiffer penalties on illegal immigration.

Highlights of the bill include:

  • Clarification that the power to regulate immigration resides with the federal government, not states and localities;
  • Provision of common‐sense rules governing the detention of families, elderly or ill immigrants, crime victims, and other vulnerable populations;
  • Mandatory use of an employment verification system for all employers within five years;
  • Creation of a new nonimmigrant visa program (H‐2C) to address gaps in existing worker programs that have lead to undocumented aliens.  H‐2C workers are eligible to apply for green cards after having worked in the U.S. for four years, or immediately if they are sponsored by their employer;
  • Assurance that the number of family and employment green cards authorized by Congress do not expire because of processing delays;
  • Expansion of the share of visas that each country can access within existing quotas that limit overall immigration;
  • Exemption for certain immigrants from counting against the annual green card quotas so that they can immediately reunite with loved ones in the U.S., including spouses and minor children of green card holders;
  • Revision of the unlawful presence bars so that individuals with family ties are not permanently banished from the U.S.;
  • Creation of a Lawful Prospective Immigrant (LPI) status for non‐criminal undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. since 9/30/10.  In order to transition from LPI status to Legal Permanent Residency, applicants are required to wait at least six years; pay taxes and a $1000 fine; learn English and U.S. civics; and undergo additional background checks. They will not obtain green cards before those who were waiting in line to immigrate as of date of enactment; and
  • Incorporation of the DREAM Act, which creates a path to legal status for individuals who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children, provided they meet age and other criteria and enroll in college or the U.S. military.

Klasko will continue to track the status of this bill on our blog.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Do You Know Where Your Senator Stands on Immigration?

Friday, April 9th, 2010

With Comprehensive Immigration Reform making its way back into the news,  Immigrants’ List published a “scorecard” on their website this week to inform voters where their Senators stand on immigration reform.  This scorecard can be accessed on their website at: http://www.immigrantslist.org/senate_scorecard.

Share/Save/Bookmark

America’s Shrinking Immigration Advantage

Monday, August 31st, 2009

Employers who rely on foreign nationals to provide needed expertise in their workforce – from technical programmers to biochemists to wind turbine engineers – should take notice of three troubling trends which are becoming clearer as the discussion about employment-based immigration reform gets drowned out by the ongoing debate about comprehensive immigration reform.

The first trend is captured in this blog post by Vivek Wadhwa, a professor at Duke University who has studied high-tech entrepreneurship extensively.  Current backlogs in the employment-based immigration categories trap foreign workers in the original job for which they were sponsored, meaning their companies cannot promote them to positions where their experience and skills can best be used.  Nor can the workers take the initiative to start their own companies – while a small company may be able to sponsor one of its owners as an H-1B, a green card is much less likely in that situation.  Wadhwa points out that eliminating the green card backlog (a major part of which consists of cases trapped by bureaucratic delays that should have been approved in past years’ quotas, which do not carry over from year to year) would free an enormous amount of human capital to innovate and create the next generation of companies that will drive economic growth in the US. (more…)

Share/Save/Bookmark

Senator Specter Switches Parties – The Immigration Angle

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

Senator Specter’s decision to switch parties and run in 2010 as a Democrat inspires mixed emotions here at KRSS.  All of us have long supported the Senator because of his well-thought-out, moderate positions on immigration legislation (some of us in spite of his Republican party membership).  His role in passing a comprehensive immigration reform bill in the Senate with both Democratic and Republican support in 2006 was, in many ways, the cumulation of more than 20 years of work to pass reasonable immigration laws that are good for our country.

AILA president Chuck Kuck says it best over on the AILA Leadership Blog:

Probably even more important is the boost this gives to those who believe, like us, that CIR is essential to renewed economic growth. Senator Specter spoke to our Spring AILA Conference (was it that which pushed him over the edge?). He let us know that he actually gets it. He understands all the key aspects of reform. He understands it is NOT just about legalization. He understands that it is also about DREAM. It is also about increased immigrant visa numbers. It is also about more sensible nonimmigrant visa categories. It is also about reforming how USCIS operates, and it is also about smarter enforcement and going after the real bad actors, not those struggling to put bread in the mouths of their children.

We certainly hope that Senator Specter can continue his leadership on the immigration issue as a member of the Democratic majority.   Because of his work on behalf of reasonable immigration laws, we will continue to support his efforts (it’s just others of us who will do it in spite of his party membership).

Share/Save/Bookmark

       
Copyright © 2012 Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.
Disclosure: Law firm web sites such as this one are considered 'Attorney Advertising' by the State Bar of New York.