|
|
|
|
 |
Posts Tagged ‘I-9 Compliance’
Thursday, October 8th, 2009
This week, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a final rule rescinding the Social Security “No-Match” regulation. The so-called No-Match rule would have charged an employer with having “constructive knowledge” of the unauthorized employment of its employees if the employer failed to take certain steps in response to receiving a No-Match letter from the Social Security Administration, informing it that an employee’s name and Social Security Number provided for a W-2 earnings report did not match SSA’s records.
(more…)
Tags: I-9 Compliance, Immigration Compliance, No-Match, No-Match Rule, Worksite Enforcement Posted in Worksite Enforcement | Click Here To Comment »
Friday, September 18th, 2009
John Morton, the newly appointed Secretary of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the enforcement arm of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) responsible for investigating immigration violations and enforcing immigration laws at the worksite said this week that ICE will continue to crackdown on employers who hire unauthorized workers. He warned employers that “You are going to see audits regularly and on a larger scale.” Secretary Morton reiterated that the agency is set to increase the number of companies it will audit and will civil impose fines on violators. ICE will also pursue criminal charges against bad-faith actors.
Secretary Morton’s comments reiterate the announcement made on July 1 by DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano that the agency would actively audit employers to verify whether their employees were eligible to work. He further confirmed that there are 654 companies currently under investigation ICE and that many more employers will receive Notices of Inspection soon.
Most recently, ICE’s audit of American Apparel, Inc. a clothing manufacturer and retailer made national headlines after the company announced that it would be laying off 1,500 employees following receipt of a Notice of Inspection. The layoffs are estimated to impact 25% of the company’s workforce. American Apparel, Inc. is also likely to face thousands of dollars in penalties for hiring workers who weren’t eligible to be employed. The government has publicly stated that fines against the company may exceed $800 per unauthorized employee. Earlier this year, Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation was also fined by ICE for violations of immigration laws following an audit of the company’s I-9s that revealed that the company employed dozens of illegal aliens at one of their doughnut factories in Cincinnati.
With the Obama Administration’s support of increased I-9 enforcement actions, it is clear that employers must pre-empt immigration related liabilities due to non-compliance with federal immigration regulations by being proactive. Internal I-9 audits are invaluable tools for identifying issues and correcting violations. Bringing in experienced immigration counsel to train human resources personnel on all aspects of immigration compliance and establish proper record-keeping procedures can significantly limit exposure and liability.
Employers who receive notices of inspection are advised to contact their immigration counsel as quickly as possible. Generally, these notices only provide three days for the employer to submit their I-9s to ICE for review. This short period of time is critical. Counsel must be contacted as quickly as possible. Employers must gather all of the company’s I-9s and supporting documentation to make sure that it is available to ICE. It is advisable to have counsel review the company’s payroll to identify any discrepancies between the number of employees and the company’s I-9s. All efforts should be made to correct any I-9s with obvious errors. Company representatives responding to the Notice of Investigation should always retain copies of any documentation submitted to ICE. Employers who can demonstrate good-faith efforts to comply with immigration laws are more likely to be assessed lower level civil fines if violations are uncovered.
For more information on government investigations and how I-9 compliance requirements affect your business please visit our website http://www.worksite-compliance.com.
Tags: Government Investigations, I-9 Compliance, ICE, Notice of Inspection Posted in Agency Updates, Hot Questions | Click Here To Comment »
Friday, August 28th, 2009
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced an extension of the validity of Form I-9, and has made a PDF-fillable version available on their web site. The new edition contains no changes from the previous edition and USCIS stated they will continue to accept the February 2, 2009 edition in addition to the current edition, dated August 7, 2009.
Tags: Agency Updates, I-9, I-9 Compliance, Worksite Enforcement Posted in Agency Updates, Worksite Enforcement | Click Here To Comment »
Thursday, July 16th, 2009
Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Janet Napolitano announced on July 8, 2009 the Agency’s plans regarding two controversial regulations dealing with worksite enforcement.
DHS announced that they would withdraw the Social Security No-match regulation which has been enjoined from taking effect and the subject of federal court litigation. Controversial since its passage, the Social Security No-Match rule established procedures that employers could follow if they received No-Match letters from the Social Security Administration or DHS. No-Match letters inform an employer that an employee’s name and Social Security Number provided for a W-2 earnings report do not match SSA records. However, DHS acknowledged in their court filings that the letters are not indicative of unauthorized employment as they are often the result of typographical errors or unreported name changes.
The regulation was promulgated as part of the previous Administration’s effort stop the employment of unauthorized aliens. Since October of 2007, the rule has been enjoined from taking effect. DHS was ordered by the Federal Court to submit a brief by July 10, 2009 explaining the Obama Administration’s view on the regulation. In the press release, Secretary Napolitano stated that DHS will imminently be proposing a new regulation rescinding the 2007 No-Match Rule.
DHS also announced that it will implement the amendment to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) which, with a few exceptions, requires federal contractors to verify the employment authorization of new employees as well as existing employees working on federal contracts. The FAR requirements apply to the verification of work eligibility on federal contracts that are for a period longer than 120 days and with a value of over $100,000. FAR also includes service or construction subcontracts of a covered contract, valued at over $3,000. Contracts for commercially available off the shelf items, as well as federal contracts for food and agricultural products shipped as bulk cargo would not be subject to this requirement. Secretary Napolitano indicated that she expects FAR to go into effect on September 8, 2009.
“E-Verify is a smart, simple and effective tool that reflects our continued commitment to working with employers to maintain a legal workforce,” said Secretary Napolitano. “Requiring those who seek federal contracts to use this system will create a more reliable and legal workforce. The rule complements our Department’s continued efforts to strengthen immigration law enforcement and protect critical employment opportunities.”
Also on July 8, 2009 the U.S. Senate approved an amendment to the Homeland Security appropriations bill, introduced by Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) that would extend the E-Verify program until September 30, 2012. In addition, the Sessions amendment would mandate the requirement that federal contractors use E-Verify without the exceptions noted above.
Tags: Agency Updates, E-Verify, I-9 Compliance, No-Match Rule, Worksite Enforcement Posted in Agency Updates | Click Here To Comment »
Wednesday, July 8th, 2009
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the enforcement arm of the Department of Homeland Security responsible for investigating immigration violations and enforcing immigration laws at the worksite, announced a nationwide initiative to audit employers’ Form I-9 employment eligibility verification records on July 1, 2009. The announcement was followed by the issuance of Notices of Inspection to 652 employers across the country. This was a strong statement by ICE of their intentions to pursue worksite enforcement actions. In comparison, only 503 Notices of Inspection were issued in all of fiscal year 2008.
The ICE announcement is in line with the recent Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announcement that the Obama Administration is interested in focusing its resources on the criminal prosecution of employers who knowingly hire illegal workers. In conjunction with the notice the DHS Assistant Secretary for ICE John Morton stated “ICE is committed to establishing a meaningful I-9 inspection program to promote compliance with the law. This nationwide effort is a first step in ICE’s long-term strategy to address and deter illegal employment.”
Under the new worksite enforcement policy, ICE began notifying businesses that it planned to inspect their hiring records to see whether employees have proper employee documentation.
ICE has indicated that many of the companies were located in New York and California. On Wednesday, American Apparel Inc., a Los Angeles clothing retailer, confirmed that ICE gave notice that 1,600 of its 5,600 factory employees might be working illegally. It couldn’t verify the status of 200 others. In Arizona alone, federal immigration-enforcement agents notified 32 Arizona companies on Wednesday that their employment records are being audited.
In this era of worksite enforcement, it is critical for employers to recognize and pre-empt immigration related liabilities due to non-compliance with federal immigration regulations. Experienced immigration counsel is invaluable to companies during this time, as they can assist with internal I-9 internal audits and providing Human Resources’ personnel with ongoing training and tools for compliance. Such actions can limit exposure and liability and establish record-keeping procedures that will establish compliance in case of an audit by ICE.
Tags: Government Investigations, Hot Topics, I-9 Compliance, Worksite Enforcement Posted in Agency Updates | 1 Comment »
Monday, June 15th, 2009
On June 10, 2009 the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) filed a request with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California for an extension until July 10, 2009 to file a memorandum in support of lifting the injunction against the implementation of the Social Security No-Match regulation. DOJ also requested an extension for filing its response to the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.
In August 2007, a group of immigrant rights organizations as well as business and employer groups asked the federal court to enjoin the regulation from taking effect. In October of that year, a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction. Since that time the case has been in litigation.
Since taking office, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has requested the court to grant several extensions of time so that the government could prepare their pleadings in the case. According to court records, the extensions are aimed at providing Secretary Napolitano with sufficient time to review the regulation in the “context of the Obama Administration’s overall immigration enforcement policies.” Since the Obama Administration took office they have taken a step back from the Bush Administration’s focus on enforcement actions against unauthorized aliens. Rather, they have stated that their top immigration enforcement priorities are towards employers who hire unauthorized workers in violation of federal immigration law.
The Social Security No-Match regulation provides that an employer’s failure to take reasonable steps after receipt of a Social Security No-Match letter can lead to a finding that an employer had “constructive knowledge” of the fact that an employee is an unauthorized alien. Under the Rule, employers would be exposed to increased liability if they fail to take a prescribed course of action termed a “safe harbor” upon receipt of a no-match letter.
The rule, while temporarily prevented from going into effect by a federal court in California, in many ways is only a codification of obligations employers have had since 1986. The Rule requires employers to take certain affirmative steps to resolve questions about an employee’s employment authorization; if the employer fails to take those steps, it can be found to “know” that the employee was not authorized.
For more information on the no-match regulation and how I-9 compliance requirements affect your business please visit our website http://www.worksite-compliance.com.
Tags: I-9 Compliance, No-Match Posted in Worksite Enforcement | Click Here To Comment »
Friday, May 1st, 2009
Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer LLP is pleased to announce the launch of our new micro-site entirely dedicated to providing employers with “need-to-have” resources to stay in compliance with US Immigration laws. The new site provides extensive information to businesses on federal and state worksite compliance laws, I-9 enforcement, E-Verify, Social Security no-match letters and H-1B Labor Condition Application compliance issues.
Special features on the site include:
· An I-9 Desk Reference Handbook (covering Employee Verification, Employer Sanctions and Anti-discrimination laws)
· An E-Verify State-by-State Legislation Survey.
The new site is www.worksite-compliance.com. We hope that you find our new site helpful and informative.
Tags: E-Verify, I-9 Compliance, ICE, Worksite Compliance, Worksite Enforcement Posted in News & Politics, Worksite Enforcement | Click Here To Comment »
Monday, April 27th, 2009
In early April, Michael Aytes, Acting Deputy Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) testified before the House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Homeland Security regarding the status of the E-Verify Program. Aytes provided detail of the program’s performance, improvements the agency has made and will continue to make in the E-Verify system, and future plans to make the I-9 easier to complete and to monitor use of the E-Verify system. A summary of his testimony is after the jump. (more…)
Tags: E-Verify, I-9 Compliance Posted in Worksite Enforcement | Click Here To Comment »
Friday, April 24th, 2009
President Obama’s nominee for Assistant Secretary for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), John Morton, faced a Senate panel for his confirmation hearing this week. He pledged to continue to prosecute bad-faith employers who hire unauthorized workers. Morton also announced that the Administration intends to eventually make use of the E-Verify, online employment verification program mandatory for all employers.
(more…)
Tags: I-9 Compliance, ICE, Worksite Enforcement Posted in Worksite Enforcement | 1 Comment »
Thursday, April 16th, 2009
Another delay has been announced in implementation of the “federal contractor rule,” which amends the Federal Acquisition Regulations to require federal contractors to enroll in and use the E-Verify system. The applicability date of the rule is now pushed back until June 30, 2009.
(more…)
Tags: E-Verify, I-9 Compliance Posted in Agency Updates, Worksite Enforcement | Click Here To Comment »
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|